These folders act just like read-only mail folders, with the article title as the subject, and configurable as either the article summary or the actual article web page as the message contents. (The full-featured Sage extension still works, and provides more powerful features, but isn't as seamless as the new built-in support.) Thunderbird 0.8 has RSS support as well in the form of an 'RSS' account type, in which can be created RSS folders. For some sites, FireFox is able to locate an RSS URL on its own, and it displays an 'RSS' button in the status bar that can be used to add a Live Bookmark. You can bookmark an RSS URL and it behaves like a bookmark sub folder, showing a recently-polled version of the link titles from the RSS feed whenever its opened. FireFox 1.0PR has RSS support in the form of 'Live Bookmarks'. I can personally confirm that both Thunderbird 0.9 and FireFox 1.0PR have RSS support, but that the mechanism and interface is completely different between the two. In the article it mentions that RSS / Atom is supported by Firefox with the 1.0PR release, but I understood that this support was added to the *email client* Thunderbird version 0.8. For more info visit Wikipedia:Image use policy. What I often do is both by having a thumbnail and a link to a larger version (like with the second image at Manzanar Japanese internment camp). If you want to have the image stand alone (like in Yosemite Valley) then it can be upto 600 pixels wide. The size depends on what you want to do with the image: If you want to have text flow around it (like in Pioneer 10) then a width of between 200-300 pixels would be best. Can anyone recommend a good image size? hoshie Actually png is much better for screenshots ( gif also works very well but there are evil patents to worry about with using that file type). I am interested in doing a screenshot for the Phoenix article. 24 Naming: Why 'Mozilla Firefox' and not just 'Firefox'.23 Firefox more multilingual than IE? Opera?.22 Opera users criticism section - Huh?.

4 Reference removed, but the citation remains.

Revert to firefox 56